SEE HOW CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES FAILED KELSEY BRIGGS!!!!
We have meetings every Tuesday at 9pm eastern time.
You must be registered with the website before you can enter the chatroom. It is free and only takes a second. Then use the same username and passwsord to log into flashchat as you use to log into this site.
Please see FAQ if still having trouble
ALSO
Pop-ups must be enabled for this to work.
If you still are having problems getting it to open try right clicking on the link and select
"Open in new window"
this should bypass the pop-up blocker.
Website: Kelsey Briggs story...the one that propelled me into cps corrupt
Posted on Wednesday, July 28, 2010 @ 16:11:32 GMT in Community
by gracenangels
Website: Kelsey Briggs story...the one that propelled me into cps corrupt
Posted on Wednesday, July 28, 2010 @ 16:07:53 GMT in Community
by gracenangels
Lyrics and song are property and copyright of their respective authors, artists and labels.
Lyrics and song provided for educational purposes only.
Please support the artists by purchasing related recordings and merchandise.Floating script Courtesy of Dynamicdrive.com
Floating Angel Courtesy of Penny Parker
9,414,043
Website: Grounds for Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights: Summary of State Laws
Posted on Wednesday, July 28, 2010 @ 12:02:19 GMT in Community
by gracenangels
Grounds for Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights: Summary of State Laws
Series: State Statutes
Author(s): Child Welfare Information Gateway
Year Published: 2007 We value your opinion!
Please comment on this publication by taking our brief survey. Your answers are anonymous and will help us better meet your future information needs. Give Us Feedback on This PublicationCurrent through June 2007
You may wish to review this introductory text to better understand the information contained in your State's statute. To see how your State addresses this issue, visit the State Statutes Search.
Every State, the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands have statutes providing for the termination of parental rights by a court. Termination of parental rights ends the legal parent-child relationship. Once the relationship has been terminated, the child is legally free to be placed for adoption, with the objective of securing a more stable, permanent family environment that can meet the child's long-term parenting needs.
Termination may be voluntary or involuntary. Birth parents who wish to place their children for adoption may voluntarily relinquish their rights.1 When addressing whether parental rights should be terminated involuntarily, most States require that a court:
- Determine, by clear and convincing evidence, that the parent is unfit2
- Determine whether severing the parent-child relationship is in the child's best interest
Grounds for Termination of Parental Rights
The grounds for involuntary termination of parental rights are specific circumstances under which the child cannot safely be returned home because of risk of harm by the parent or the inability of the parent to provide for the child's basic needs. Each State is responsible for establishing its own statutory grounds, and these vary by State.
The most common statutory grounds for determining parental unfitness include:
- Severe or chronic abuse or neglect
- Abuse or neglect of other children in the household
- Abandonment
- Long-term mental illness or deficiency of the parent(s)
- Long-term alcohol- or drug-induced incapacity of the parent(s)
- Failure to support or maintain contact with the child
- Involuntary termination of the rights of the parent to another child
Another common ground for termination is a felony conviction of the parent(s) for a crime of violence against the child or another family member, or a conviction for any felony when the term of incarceration is so long as to have a negative impact on the child, and the only available provision of care for the child is foster care.
The Adoption and Safe Families Act (ASFA) requires State agencies to file a petition to terminate parental rights, with certain exceptions, when:3
- A child has been in foster care for 15 of the most recent 22 months.
- A court has determined:
- A child to be an abandoned infant
- That the parent has committed murder or voluntary manslaughter of another child of the parent; aided, abetted, attempted, conspired, or solicited to commit such a murder or voluntary manslaughter; or committed a felony assault that has resulted in serious bodily injury to the child or another child of the parent
In response to ASFA, many States have adopted limits to the maximum amount of time a child can spend in foster care before termination proceedings can be initiated. Typically, States have adopted the ASFA standard of 15 out of the most recent 22 months in care. Some States, however, specify shorter time limits, particularly for very young children. The laws in most States are consistent with the other termination grounds required under ASFA.
The above factors become grounds for terminating parental rights when reasonable efforts by the State to prevent out-of-home placement or to achieve reunification of the family after placement have failed to correct the conditions and/or parental behaviors that led to State intervention.4
Exceptions
ASFA requires that proceedings to terminate parental rights be initiated when the child has been in foster care for 15 of the most recent 22 months. An exception may be made under some circumstances, including:
- The child has been placed under the care of a relative.
- The State agency has documented in the case plan a compelling reason to believe that terminating the parent's rights is not in the best interests of the child.
- The parent has not been provided with the services required by the service plan for reunification of the parent with the child.
Approximately 20 States and the District of Columbia confirm these requirements in their statutes.5
Effects of Termination
A termination action can sever the rights of one parent without affecting the rights of the other parent. If the rights of both parents are terminated, the State assumes legal custody of the child along with the responsibility for finalizing a permanent placement for the child, either through adoption or guardianship, within a reasonable amount of time.
In approximately four States, if a permanent placement has not been achieved within a specific timeframe, a petition may be filed with the court requesting reinstatement of the parent's rights.6 If the court determines that the parent is now able to provide a safe home for the child, the request may be granted.
To see how your State addresses this issue, visit the State Statutes Search.
To find information on all the States and territories, view the complete printable PDF, Grounds for Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights: Summary of State Laws (PDF - 444 KB).
Please comment on this publication by taking our brief survey. Your answers are anonymous and will help us better meet your future information needs. Give Us Feedback on This Publication1 For State-by-State details on voluntary relinquishment, see Information Gateway publication Consent to Adoption at www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/laws_policies/statutes/consent.cfm. Back
2 The U.S. Supreme Court, in Santosky v. Kramer (455 U.S. § 745 (1982)), set the standard of proof in termination of parental rights proceedings at clear and convincing evidence. Back
3 ASFA (P.L. 105-89) amended title IV-E of the Social Security Act, which establishes guidelines that States must comply with as a condition for receiving Federal funds. Back
4 For more detailed information on the reasonable efforts requirement, see Information Gateway's Reasonable Efforts to Reunify Families at www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/laws_policies/statutes/reunify.cfm. Back
5 The word approximately is used to stress the fact that States frequently amend their laws. This information is current only through June 2007. The States that currently provide for these exceptions include Alabama, Alaska, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Maryland, Massachusetts, Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Oregon, Tennessee, West Virginia, and Wyoming. In other States, the Federal requirements apply to any child whose foster care maintenance payments are funded through the title IV-E program. Back
6 In California, after 3 years, a child who is age 12 or older may petition (Welf. & Inst. Code § 366.26(i); in Hawaii, after 1 year, the parent or State Department may petition (Rev. Stat. § 571-63); in Nevada, the child or the legal guardian of a child who has not been adopted and is not likely to be adopted may petition (2007 Nev. Ch. 43); and in Washington, after 3 years, a child who is age 12 or older may petition (2007 Wa. HB 1624, § 1). Back
This publication is a product of the State Statutes Series prepared by Child Welfare Information Gateway. While every attempt has been made to be as complete as possible, additional information on these topics may be in other sections of a State's code as well as agency regulations, case law, and informal practices and procedures.
Email
Print (PDF 444 KB) 
ShareWebsite: mORE SERIOUS BLACK BOX WARNING ON ANTPYSOTIC DRUGS
Posted on Tuesday, July 27, 2010 @ 23:21:37 GMT in Community
by gracenangels
Black Box Warnings
Box Denotes a Drug's Possible Serious Side Effects or RisksFrom Michael Bihari, MD, former About.com Guide
Updated August 18, 2008
About.com Health's Disease and Condition content is reviewed by the Medical Review Board
©iStockphotoA black box warning is the sternest warning by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that a medication can carry and still remain on the market in the United States.
A black box warning appears on the label of a prescription medication to alert you and your healthcare provider about any important safety concerns, such as serious side effects or life-threatening risks.
A black box warning, also known as a “black label warning” or “boxed warning,” is named for the black border surrounding the text of the warning that appears on the package insert, label, and other literature describing the medication (e.g., magazine advertising). It is the most serious medication warning required by the FDA.
When Does the FDA Require a Boxed Warning?
The FDA requires a black box warning for one of the following situations:
- The medication can cause serious undesirable effects (such as a fatal, life-threatening or permanently disabling adverse reaction) compared to the potential benefit from the drug. Depending on your health condition, you and your doctor would need to decide if the potential benefit of taking the drug is worth the risk.
- A serious adverse reaction can be prevented, reduced in frequency, or reduced in severity by proper use of the drug. For example, a medication may be safe to use in adults, but not in children. Or, the drug may be safe to use in adult women who are not pregnant.
What Information Does the FDA Require in the “Black Box”?
The FDA requires the boxed warning to provide a concise summary of the adverse side effects and risks associated with taking the medication. You and your doctor need to be aware of this information when deciding to start the drug or if you should switch to another medication altogether. Understanding side effects will help you make a better informed decision.
Examples of Black Box Warnings
The following are examples of black box warnings that have been required for some commonly used medications:
Fluoroquinolone Antibiotics
According to the FDA, people taking a fluoroquinolone antibiotic have an increased risk of tendinitis and tendon rupture, a serious injury that could cause permanent disability. The FDA warning includes Cipro (ciprofloxacin), Levaquin (levofloxacin), Avelox (moxifloxacin) and other medications containing fluoroquinolone. (Warning issued July 2008.)Diabetes Medications
According to the FDA, people with diabetes taking Avandia (rosiglitazone) have an increased risk of heart failure or heart attack if they already have heart disease or are at high risk of suffering a heart attack. (Warning issued November 2007.)Antidepressant Medications
According to the FDA, all antidepressant medications have an increased risk of suicidal thinking and behavior, known as suicidality, in young adults ages 18 to 24 during initial treatment (generally the first one to two months). The FDA warning includes Zoloft (sertraline), Paxil (paroxetine), Lexapro (escitalopram), and other antidepressant medication. (Warning issued May 2007.)What Does a Black Box Warning Look Like?
The following excerpt from the prescription label of Zoloft is an example of a black box warning.
Suicidality in Children and Adolescents
Antidepressants increased the risk of suicidal thinking and behavior (suicidality) in short-term studies in children and adolescents with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and other psychiatric disorders. Anyone considering the use of Zoloft or any other antidepressant in a child or adolescent must balance this risk with the clinical need. Patients who are started on therapy should be observed closely for clinical worsening, suicidality, or unusual changes in behavior. Families and caregivers should be advised of the need for close observation and communication with the prescriber. Zoloft is not approved for use in pediatric patients except for patients with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD).Medication Guides
Along with a black box warning, the FDA also requires a drug company to create a medication guide that contains information for consumers on how to safely use a specific medication. The guides contain FDA-approved information that can help you avoid a serious adverse event.
These guides are meant to be given out by your pharmacist at the time you have your prescription filled. The guides are also available online from the drug company and from the FDA. For example, the medication guide for Avandia (rosiglitazone) is available from GlaxoSmithKline, the manufacturer of Avandia, and from the FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
If you are concerned that your medication has a black box warning, ask your pharmacist and, if available, obtain a printed copy of the medication guide.
Additional Resources
The Drug Information Center of the Kansas University Medical Center maintains an online listing of all medications that have a black box warning. The medications are listed by generic names. If you are taking a brand name drug and would like to know the generic name, use the About.com Drugs A to Z listing.
BLACK BOX WARNING ON PHYCOTROPICS DRUGS
Posted on Tuesday, July 27, 2010 @ 23:15:23 GMT in Community
by gracenangels
Black Box Drug Warnings
Pediatric Drug WarningsBy Vincent Iannelli, M.D., About.com Guide
Updated February 12, 2006
About.com Health's Disease and Condition content is reviewed by the Medical Review Board
Feb 12 2006Parents are becoming quite familiar with the term 'black box warning,' as the FDA is applying their most serious warning to more and more medicines.In addition to antidepressants, eczema medicines (Elidel and Protopic), and asthma medicines (Advair and Serevent), it looks like stimulant medications that are used to treat ADHD, including Ritalin, Concerta, Adderall, and Focalin, may also soon get a black box warning. Strattera, a non-stimulant that is used to treat ADHD already has its own black box warning.
The FDA's Drug Safety & Risk Management Advisory Committee recently recommended that ADHD stimulant drugs receive a black box warning on their labels to discuss their possible risk of causing high blood pressure, stroke, and sudden death.
It is important to note that this recommendation does not mean that the FDA will add the black box warning and that there is no proven link between case reports of cardiac problems and ADHD drugs.
Black Box Warnings
The need for warnings on medicines is clear, as several drugs have recently been withdrawn from the market because of known side effects. Many experts question if adding warnings to medicines even when the link to side effects hasn't been proven, as in the case of antidepressants, eczema medicines, and ADHD medicines, will be as effective.With so many warnings out there, won't people just start ignoring the warnings?
That is definitely one possible problem with all of the recent warnings. Many doctors and parents may simply get so used to the warnings that they don't even consider them when deciding if a child should take a medicine.
Although being silent and ignoring obvious safety hazards would be a mistake, scaring people about rare and theoretical risks, espeically when the benefits of the medicines outweigh those risks doesn't do anyone any good.
Adding to the controversy, with the new warnings, many experts come out against them, as in the case of Elidel and Protopic, which are used to treat kids with eczema. Althought the FDA added a black box warning to them recently, the American Academy of Dermatology issued a statement in response to the FDA warning, saying that they disagree with the FDA and that they believe that current research doesn't prove that Elidel and Protopic are dangerous when used properly.
ADHD Black Box Warning
There is no general ADHD black box warning yet. The FDA will now have to review the recommendations of the Drug Safety & Risk Management Advisory Committee, which voted 8 to 7 for the black box warning, with one abstention, and make a decision on whether to actually add the black box warning.And when considering whether or not to keep your kids on ADHD medicines, keep in mind what Dr. Laurence Greenhill had to say, when he testified in front of an FDA committee on behalf of The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and the American Psychiatric Association:
Stimulant medications offer many benefits to a wide range of children, and have proven to be safe over a half-century of use.There also seems to be some politics behind the new recommendation for the black box warning. Reading between the lines, you get the feeling that some panel members feel that ADHD is being overdiagnosed and that stimulant medicines are being overused. Could a black box warning be their way of reining in the use of ADHD drugs, like Adderall and Ritalin?Pediatrics
comments? | Score: 0 | 7 reads
Website: A NEW FROINTIER OF CIVIL RIGHTS
Posted on Tuesday, July 27, 2010 @ 23:08:07 GMT in Community
by gracenangels
There is a new frontier and I say new, because most Caucasians aren't used to civil rights violations as it pertains to their families. They certainly have dished it out....consider the tribes and what they went through. In the name of social reform and religious ideation, the white bureaucrats demolished the native tribes taking their children, putting them in boarding homes then "re-educated" their victims. Many never saw or heard from their families again. As a result of legal litigation long overdue, the tribes have federal protection - something that drives the power hungry Children's Administration who want no barriers to child removal crazy.
The Africans faced untold terror as they were removed from their homeland, sold into slavery, and forced to jump over brooms to get married. Often their children were sold on the market like cattle and disappeared as frightened small ghosts. Horrified parents would put the word out trying to find out what happened on the information chain. Sometimes they found out, sometimes they didn't. Many children ended up tortured and dead. Currently, they have the "dis-proportionality card" and organized groups of highly educated prominent individuals who regularly voice descent at the civil rights atrocities occurring in their defense. Relative placement seems to be a higher priority in the black community and bio family isn't nit picked and dissected for character defects as much as some.
Now, it is the Caucasians turn. Not just any Caucasians though, only the poor ones. The middle and upper classes enjoy the advantage of child removal laws that somehow remove the risk of most government intervention. Orders are taken from potential parents wanting to adopt. They want the blond haired blue eyed little girls and boys and they are getting them. Relatives are regularly kicked to the curb in favor of stranger placement and told they have no rights.
From the moment an impoverished mother steps into the Doctors office and gets a positive pregnancy test, the games begin. Drug tests and background history start the process of collecting evidence for the prosecution. A test for depression is offered (please don't take it) and the subjectivity of the test and broad ranging questions hands government intervention opportunities to them on a silver platter. This is important to states who find themselves struggling financially because the federal financial entitlements produce a thriving economy using public funds and dwindling social security dollars for child removal and adoption.
Doctors have set themselves up as an absolute legal authority. For a parent to disagree with an offered treatment or service is failure to follow medical advice and CPS will get called in. Hospitals can place a hold on a child for pretty much any reason. If one misses an appointment with either a doctor or the Women's Infants and Children program it may mean being accused of medical neglect and child removal. The reasons for removal do not have to be imminent danger - just a power struggle and subjective reasoning.
This puts the poorer Caucasian community in a real dilemma. Faced with more civil rights violations both in CPS and family courts then one can count, they find there are no laws that protect white people from subjective and erroneous government intervention. Caucasians are in unfamiliar territory without a voice or advocate. Perhaps it was assumed it would never be necessary but things have evolved.
How do they justify their actions? Its all about obscure arguable reasoning that in practice doesn't happen most of the time. One argument is children fare better in a two parent household so they remove from single parents using that as one of the reasons only to place with a single foster/adopt. Another is bonding. Once a child is removed, heaven help the parent if the child even smiles at the foster because that is deemed "bonded" and will get used against family in a court of law.
The bonding argument is used in virtually every dependency case. They mistake adaptation for bonding regularly never asking children their preference. As a matter of fact, it is in writing not to. So, while the children are screaming for their families, acting out and getting drugged to death, the caseworkers are in the court room talking about "loving foster families" and "forever homes" where they state the child is bonded more to the foster than the parents or extended family. Using flowery words that look nothing like the real picture, they destroy family after family. Perjury is the number one most protected crime by the government in family dependency cases and is how the case goes to termination most of the time.
The white impoverished race is in trouble with nowhere to turn except to the very people that have been raped by the government for 200 years and know the ropes. Because the need to change and challenge this status quo requires rapid intervention to gain back parental and bio family rights, the races should be working together and are not. Will they help us? They don't have to. I am hoping that the spiritual will recognize that it is the poor of all races that are under attack and bind together as a unified force. We can change this horrible travesty in motion, but we need each other to do it.
Subject: Fw: 5 USC 552 Freedom of Information Act 2/1/2010
you can use this Act to request your records from private contractors, CPS/SRS, courts, lawyers, etc.They have to give them to you. the complete records. click on this website.this is the 5 USC 552 freedom of Informaiton Act that was amended 2/1/2010 that we can use to get the records.
Website: Gov is daring to keep foster kids on drugs
Posted on Monday, July 26, 2010 @ 14:02:24 GMT in Community
by gracenangels
Government is daring to keep kids on drugsMonday, July 26, 2010 11:49 AM From:"Psych_News@psychsearch.net" <Psych_News@psychsearch.net>Add sender to ContactsTo:"Psych News" <Psych_News@psychsearch.net>Government is daring to keep kids on drugsBy Tom LyonsSunday, July 25, 2010Apparently the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had at least heard about the suicide of Gabriel Myers.Myers' death by hanging happened in a Florida foster home last year, but that wasn't the main reason it triggered a major reaction at Florida's Department of Children and Families.The real reason: He was 7 years old.Whatever else might have helped lead such a young child toward ending his life, one detail was impossible to ignore: The boy was being treated with three different psychotropic medications.Medications of that sort make some people more depressed or even suicidal, and their effects when combined are harder to predict, especially in children.So DCF did a quick check on how many foster children were being given such drugs. Troubling facts emerged.Not only was the percentage high, it was not really known. And, in more than a third of known cases, required approval permission documents were missing.DCF Secretary George Sheldon quickly acknowledged the problem and started a study group to learn more and give advice. And a year later, the picture is at least more clear. Very few files lack required documentation now. And when I asked for the most current numbers, they were available, and somewhat lower. In the Sarasota-Manatee-DeSoto county region, 11 percent of foster children are given psychotropic meds. Statewide, it is 13 percent.Some critics insist too many foster parents, lacking the skill or patience to work with troubled children who arrive as strangers, are still too quick to see medication as the way to curb problem behavior or just keep foster children quiet, no matter the side effects.But whatever the truth of that, the study group recommended some good changes, and one made sense immediately, I thought: Ban the use of foster kids in drug trials.Drugs helpful to some adults can react differently in children, who may suffer more extreme and unintended side effects. And so, clinical trials on children are needed, but it it is a scary field of study. The most alert and caring parents are key for monitoring the children during such trials, I would think.So I was surprised at the FDA's response when Sheldon wrote to ask how many Florida foster children were involved in drug studies as they bounce from foster family to foster family.Jill Hartzler, an associate FDA commissioner, responded that the FDA -- which oversees the studies to make sure children's involvement is approved and understood by parents or guardians -- didn't have an exact number. Or even an estimate. The FDA, in fact, doesn't have the slightest idea how many Florida foster kids are or have been involved in its drug studies.But that wasn't the weirdest part. Hartzler and the FDA also urged that Florida not bar foster kids from drug trials, arguing that benefits can outweigh risks.I'm happy to say Sheldon is not taking that advice. But as he explains his reasoning more tactfully than does Richard Wexler of the National Coalition for Child Protection Reform, I'll quote Wexler, who says the FDA's position is absurd."I would love to ask Associate Commissioner Hartzler," Wexler said, "if she'd care to let a total stranger decide if her children should be enrolled in a trial for a potentially dangerous drug."
Website: CA PROTECTIVE PARENTS ASSC
Posted on Sunday, July 11, 2010 @ 08:39:20 GMT in
by gracenangels
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CA Protective Parents Association ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dear Friends: 1. The National Coalition Against Domestic Violence (NCADV) conference is in Anaheim CA the end of July and beginning of August 2010. http://www.ncadv.org/NCADV gets it - they are presenting an entire track on family court!
On Monday, August 2 the Plenary Session is on Child Custody and Domestic Violence.
FROM DISGRUNTLED LITIGANTS TO THE CANARIES OF THE CUSTODY COURT SYSTEM: Protective Mothers Were Right-They Are Being Mistreated by the Courts
Opening remarks from Ms. Joye E. Frost, Director, Office on Victims of Crime. The new book, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, ABUSE and CHILD CUSTODY establishes that the routine use of outdated and discredited practices has resulted in thousands of children being sent to live with abusers. The research is now readily available to challenge and prevent the common mistakes that so often harm children. The success of the abuser tactic seeking custody to maintain control over their victims and failure of the courts to recognize this tactic undermine the work of our movement and have led to an increase in domestic violence homicides after many years of declines. Mo Therese Hannah will discuss the research available to help protective mothers. Judge Mike Brigner will explain how judges are getting it wrong so often. Garland Waller exposes the failure of the media to report this scandal. You will want to stay until the end because Barry Goldstein will explain how to use this information in your home communities as we use the research in the book to reform the broken custody court system, prevent the unfair attacks on protective mothers and make sure no child has to cry herself to sleep because a court separated her from her safe, courageous, protective mother.
On Tuesday August 3 CA Protective Parents Association and Center for Judicial Excellence will present a workshop titled "Action: Let's Roll" from 10:15 to noon.
2. Kathie Justi, a wonderful protective mom who was instrumental in bringing down a judge and changing the culture of the Santa Clara California family court to better protect battered women and children, is interested in compiling testimonials about your journey through this ordeal. Let me know if you would like her contact information.
Her vision: "Many mother's have lost custody, some regained their child(ren), some didn't until they were 18, and able to try to establish a relationship. Many mothers have written their custody story, but this is about you! Not about your dear children. This story is about your own journey, your struggles, your successes, your triumphs, your losses. Coping, not coping. You didn't give up, because you are here now."
3. New resource: Safe Child International: http://www.causes.com/causes/497298?m=71bb3202&recruiter_id=84515530.
4. New book: Sexual Sabotage by Judith Reisman PhD about Alfred Kinsey's early junk science that underlies the current junk science that encourages sex offenders to get custody of their victims.
5. September 12-15, 2010. The International Violence, Abuse and Trauma (IVAT) conference is being held in San Diego http://www.ivatcenters.org/ There is an excellent training from September 10-12 by Child Abuse Solutions www.childabusesolutions.com in the Affiliated Training section which is designed for evaluators and other court related professionals.
6. Keep Friday October 1, 2010 open for another exciting demonstration at the White House with a parade to the U.S. Dept of Justice and the U.S. Senate!
Best, Connie
Posted on Saturday, July 03, 2010 @ 14:02:51 GMT in
by gracenangels
EXPOSE THE ABUSE FREEDOM LIVE SHOW!
WELCOME!!
BLOGGING,TALKING-EXPOSING JOIN US EVERY SUNDAY"HELP US " E'XPOSE"CORRUPTION!
NOW for The Rest Of The story
WELCOME TO
JANE AND T.K.
EXPOSING
ABUSE FREEDOM LIVE
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/abusefreedomlive
July 4th, 2010from7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.Eastern Time Zone
This Sunday Night’s Guest
This week we have a very Special Guest!
Josie Perez of Modelfamily.org
and cps Chronicles will be aboard with us the whole hour!
We will be announcing some very exciting news and also explaining how to fill out the ocr forms being sent to you!
YOU MUST NOT MISS THIS SHOW
PETER LOVESINGER,SONGWRITER,SAVE OUR CHILDREN FOUNDATION..ECT.PETER WILL BE SPEAKING WITH GUEST ALSO TALKING ABOUT THE WASHINGTON DC RALLY OF WHICH HE WILL BE SINGING AND SPEAKING!!listen to his music!
ANNOUNCEMENTS!!
Welcome to the website of Recording Artist, Singer/Songwriter, Entertainer and Music Producer Peter Love. Love's other websites are located to the right of this page. Click on the links to visit them. Scroll to the bottom of this window to read more about Peter Love and his incredible music/songs, career, his "Band of Love," and achievements. For more, visit the menu links to the left. Below the photo of Peter Love you can click on the link to see a live performance.
Mr. Love, The Smooth Entertainer, sings and performs music of all genres. He has a very dynamic stage show that caters to his audience. He and his Band Of Love perform songs that include Top 40, Jazz, Blues, Light Rock, R&B, Motown Hits, Love Ballads, Instrumentals and requests and songs from his CDs. Songs are oldies to the present. The songs Love performs include famous and favorite artist that is sure to satisfy everyone: Mr. Love is a hell of a dancer and plays a mean harmonica. His Super Band Of Love include: Lead Guitar, Bass Guitar, Keyboards and Drums. They are the best musicians around and compliment Peter Love's show that always receive a standing ovation! They have performed across the country and abroad at all types of music venues. Music critics have given Peter Love nothing but positive reviews with the highest praise. Go to Peter Love's website's guest book to read the emotional and sincere testimonials from people around the world. Their words about Mr. Love are incredible; some will make even the strongest soul cry. You will love Peter Love and want more! Peter Love is now accepting shows for hire. Due to high volume of requests for shows, now is the time to call for shows in advance for Thanksgiving, Christmas and New Years gigs. For bookings call (708) 873-1801 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting (708) 873-1801 end_of_the_skype_highlighting. Peter Love is presently working with his Band Of Love appearing at various venues around the country and abroad with much success and rave reviews! He is receiving international radio airplay from songs from three of his CDs: 1.Unforgettable Love CD --Daddy's Little Girl, A Mother's Love and I Wanna Make Love. 2 . Save Our Children CD-- Save Our Children (Vocals) and Save Our Children (Instrumental) and 3. My Safe Harbor CD -- My Safe Harbor. In addition, Love is presently working on his new CD to be announce soon. The long awaiting CD is sure to be another winner for Peter Love. Mr. Love's fans will love his new CD with new songs he has written with you in mind. Stay tuned. His Save Our Children song, which created the Save Our Children Day/Crusade and The Peter Love SOC Foundation, continues to be an international draw to combat child abuse. Awesome!
Aberdeen, MS.
June 16 - 17, 2006
The two-day second annual "Save Our Children Day" for the City Of Aberdeen was a huge success cultimating with a rousing performance at the Aberdome by founder and recording artist/songwriter Peter Love.We want to thank everyone that came from across the country to support and make this dream, the SOC Day/Concert, a reality. We will be listing those involved with making this day possible; posting names, speakers, organizations, pictures, newspaper articles, etc., and of course, the official Second Annual SOC Day Proclamation issued by the City of Aberdeen, MS. Awesome!With Love,
The SOC (Save Our Children) Foundation :-)
646) 595-2134All NEW Show With JANE and T.K.
NOW! for The Rest Of The Stories
PLEASE POST ON YOUR FACEBOOK, MYSPACE AND WEBSITES!!! MAKE ABUSE FREEDOM LIVE#1 IN THE NATION. LET’S PROTECT OUR FAMILIES BY PROMOTING AWARENESS BEFORE IT HAPPENSUpdated News Nationwide
Callers welcome to call in from your state to update listeners with any new news in your region
The Abuse Freedom LIVE Radio Blog Talk Is HOSTED BY JANE OF ABUSE FREEDOM UNITED http:www.abusefreedom.com And
T.K.with www.OfficalDCRallyfest.com
OPEN LINES LATER IN THE SHOW FOR COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS
646) 595-2134
· CALL IN NUMBER
You can subscribe to this show on ipod touch or your iphone
Go to http://blogtalkradio.com/abusefreedomlive
If you are an advocate, group or organization advocating on behalf of family preservation and would like to be on show contactJane at jane@abusefreedom.com (803) 438 8119 or TK www.officaldcrallyfest.com.317 214 9787
The abuse freedom live show may contain language not suitable for children. Also note: The opinions and views of our guests and callers do not necessarily reflect the views and agenda of Abuse Freedom United, . It is recommended that all callers keep their questions to a minimum so that we may be able to give our guests our full undivided attention. Abuse Freedom United would like to thank our guests last week and appreciate the time taken to inform and educate our listening audience. Your participation and time on our shows help to educate families with respect to family preservation nationwide jane@abusefreedom.com Jane (President). ABUSE FREEDOM UNITED CORP.
ABUSE FREEDOM UNITED: PLANNING, ORGANIZING; STANDING UNITED NATIONWIDE!!!!
comments? | Score: 0 | 29 reads
Website: OCR COMPLAINT FORMS
Posted on Saturday, July 03, 2010 @ 11:54:43 GMT in Community
by gracenangels
Region IV - Atlanta (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee)
Roosevelt Freeman, Regional Manager
Office for Civil Rights
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Atlanta Federal Center, Suite 3B70
61 Forsyth Street, S.W.
Atlanta, GA 30303-8909
Voice Phone (404)562-7886
FAX (404)562-7881
TDD (404)331-2867
- Send the complaint to the appropriate OCR Regional office or OCR headquarters.
- Address inquiries to the OCR Regional Manager.
- Contact the OCR regional office for your State or Territory, or the headquarters office for further information.
HeadquartersGeorgina Verdugo, Director
Office for Civil Rights
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
Room 509F HHH Bldg.
Washington, D.C.20201
